Strong Angel III – Design considerations / recommendations for humanitarian aid systems

Some of the NGOs participating at SA III came up with 8 considerations for tech companies interested in developing solutions for peacebuilding and humanitarian aid systems.

1. How does the technology strengthen local community leaders’ ability to communicate and influence resource decisions in a disaster?

2. What are the social, cultural, political and economic implications of the deployment of the technology for the recovery stage of the disaster and how does it affect the community’s attitude towards existing infrastructure and services following the disaster?

3. What is the suitability for use by local respnders in terms of ease of use, apporpriate languages and the possibility of easily modifying its application to particular environments and users skills and needs?

4. Can it be adapted for use with a PDA, cellphone or other relatively inexpensive mobile communication device?

5. Does it reflect and support an itegrated architecture solution and open standards?

6. Does it provide easy access to the internet and / or is it easily accesible from the internet?

7. Is it affordable to local community leaders, non-profits etc from a cost standpoint?

8. As much as possible, ensure that solutions are rugged, portable, scaleable and appropriate for use in impact (affected) areas.

Related posts:
Humanitarian aid and peacebuilding

Technology for humanitarian aid – 6 mantras

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: