Games. Seriously.

If there’s anything that drives advances in computing power, it’s games. Today’s average graphics card packs more punch than a mainstream desktop of even a few years ago. The elegant beheading or dismembering of an opponent in Unreal Tournament is, for some, an actual profession, since full-time gamers are now increasingly being recognized as serious sportsmen and sportswomen.

It’s interesting that most of the games in the market, on whatever platform one chooses to play them on, are violent. They may differ on the levels of blood and gore, but the basic idea is the same – the more accurately one can render the physics of an artery ripped open by an exotic weapon, the better the game will sell. There is no other explanation for the success of games such as Quake, Doom, Unreal Tournament and Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas.

It’s remarkable when you think about it. Apart from scientific visualization – say the unfolding of a protein or DNA – the most advanced graphics are used in pursuit of the ever increasing realism of in-game violence. From the pixellated red splotches of early games such as Wolfenstein 3D to the incredible realism made possible by today’s advanced graphics cards such as Ageia’s Physix, the rendition of violence is the staple of the gaming industry, a time tested recipe for the almost guaranteed success of a game.

There’s increasing debate on just how much of an influence this on-screen violence has on our day-to-day lives. Are we more violent because we kill unthinkingly in games? Do violent games in regions of actual ethnic or political violence inflame tensions? At what age should children be allowed to play violent games? What are the stereotypes that are promoted by games such as Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas? Are those who play games less inclined towards non-violent conflict resolution in real life? What role does good parenting play in contextualizing violent games?

These aren’t new questions to researchers who have been studying the impact of games on children, youth and adults for a number of years. This article however wants to point towards an emerging school of games called “Serious Games”, which are being looked at by cutting-edge peacebuilding and humanitarian initiatives to bring attention to some of the world’s most pressing problems such as hunger, violence and conflict.

Read my full article, published first in iTimes, here.

2 comments on “Games. Seriously.

  1. Jolly Lucifer
    December 29, 2006 at 8:57 am #

    Technically, the Ageia PhysX is a Physics Processing Unit (PPU). Not quite the same thing as a graphics card.

    You say ‘most of the games in the market’… have you found any specific statistics? Do they cover all markets, genres and platforms? I’d agree about the ‘most’ part, but that’s vague enough to cover 51% to 99%.

    Serious Games have been around for a while. I like the spirit behind it, but their marketing leaves much to be desired. The industry is big enough for just about everyone and yet most people wouldn’t be able to name a single Serious Game.

  2. Player1
    May 18, 2010 at 8:26 pm #

    I would argue that the “most games are violent” part is plain wrong. I agree that the most talked about games are violent, but that’s a different story altogether. You seem to forget about many genres that don’t feature violence, like sports games or driving games, casual, quiz, puzzle, platform, you name it games. Or maybe we just have a different view on what violence is.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: